
Joy Kiiru

Joy is a senior lecturer at the Department of Economics and Development Studies at the University of Nairobi, with a PhD from Bonn University, Germany. Her research focuses on development economics, particularly financial inclusion, rural development, and the economics of gender and social inclusion. Joy has collaborated with numerous organizations, including CIMMYT, FAO, TRAPCA, and UNWomen, and has worked internationally to influence evidence-based decision-making.
In 2020, Joy became passionate about translating research into impactful policies and joined J-PAL at MIT as a consultant. She later served as a Research and Innovations Technical Advisor for Chemonics International, overseeing projects in East, West, and Southern Africa. Currently, she consults for the Gates Foundation, supporting Women’s Economic Empowerment programs in Kenya.
Outside of her work, Joy actively contributes to her community through her Rotary club, implementing projects in education, health, and the environment.
Follow Joy on
Follow Joy on
Joy is a senior lecturer at the Department of Economics and Development Studies at the University of Nairobi, with a PhD from Bonn University, Germany. Her research focuses on development economics, particularly financial inclusion, rural development, and the economics of gender and social inclusion. Joy has collaborated with numerous organizations, including CIMMYT, FAO, TRAPCA, and UNWomen, and has worked internationally to influence evidence-based decision-making.
In 2020, Joy became passionate about translating research into impactful policies and joined J-PAL at MIT as a consultant. She later served as a Research and Innovations Technical Advisor for Chemonics International, overseeing projects in East, West, and Southern Africa. Currently, she consults for the Gates Foundation, supporting Women’s Economic Empowerment programs in Kenya.
Outside of her work, Joy actively contributes to her community through her Rotary club, implementing projects in education, health, and the environment.
In their own words…
IEA – Could you walk us through the key moments that shaped your path – from your earliest exposure to economic thinking, to what sparked your interest in the field, and ultimately what drew you to academic research?
Joy – To be candid about my career path – it’s been shaped by a combination of circumstance and deliberate choices. Growing up in a rural area, we had limited exposure to high-level academic role models. Career aspirations were often influenced by what we saw around us – primarily nurses and teachers – and the readings we did. My career choice kept changing with every exposure. For example, early readings of Ben Carson and Nancy Drew sparked my interest in medicine and detective work, respectively. When I joined high school, STEM careers were rated above everything else, and I was easily influenced. When I was selected to study for Bachelor of Arts at the University, I felt frustrated and even contemplated not attending college at all. There was a lack of information about what a Bachelor of Arts degree entailed. It was my primary school teacher who convinced me of the value of all degrees, and I trusted her judgment.
By the time I enrolled, many departments had closed admissions, but economics and philosophy were still open. Philosophy honed my critical thinking and self-esteem, while economics introduced me to the potential for creating positive change. I became passionate about the discipline, particularly the research aspect. From methodologies to problem modelling, data collection, and analysis, I found it all exhilarating. Research showed me how things could be different and what was needed to achieve those impacts. Winning a competitive research grant before completing my master’s degree led to my first job as a research associate at the University of Nairobi’s Department of Economics.
IEA – What motivated your focus on digital economy solutions for youth unemployment in Africa? Your research mentions Africa’s digital infrastructure gap. Could you provide specific examples of the most critical infrastructure challenges you’ve identified? What specific implementation challenges have you observed?
Joy – Youth unemployment poses a significant global challenge. While the 2023 global youth unemployment rate of 13% marks a 15-year low, this figure doesn’t include underemployment, which can sometimes represent disguised unemployment. Furthermore, the rate varies considerably by region and gender, with rates exceeding 30% in areas like the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa, and the global youth NEET rate (Not in Employment, Education, or Training) for young women being more than double that of young men.
Amidst jobless growth in many economies, digital inclusion has emerged as a vital support for youth employment through three primary avenues: access to online jobs, the creation of digital startups and other services (including entertainment), and broader market access via digital platforms and online social media. Digital inclusion is also essential for networking and communication, which are both crucial for finding and maintaining employment.
Despite its importance, significant gaps in digital infrastructure persist, impacting access, usage, and safety of digital platforms. The affordability of mobile phones (especially smartphones), digital literacy, and social gender norms are among the constraints hindering progress. Investments are needed to make mobile phones and smartphones affordable and accessible. Digital literacy and internet access should be prioritized as educational, employment, and networking tools. Robust policies that foster competition within the sector are also essential, as governments alone may not achieve the desired impact, highlighting the need for private sector involvement. It is imperative that basic digital skills, including internet use, safety, and coding, are introduced early in the education system to prepare youth for the future (or perhaps the current) world, where digital innovation and work re-engineering through digital platforms are prevalent. Youth must be equipped for this reality, while economies should brace for continued jobless growth and the necessity for stronger safety nets to ensure equitable distribution of growth benefits for human well-being.
IEA – What have you learned about why Kenya’s youth employment programs aren’t working, and what needs to change to make them more effective?
Joy – Kenya’s youth employment interventions face two major challenges: politicization and weak institutions. This combination results in resource leakages and, ultimately, insignificant impacts from these interventions. For instance, Kazi Mtaani, a public works social protection and youth employment program providing jobs in clean-up and infrastructure maintenance, is conceptually sound. However, weak management practices lead to inflated costs, making the project unsustainable and preventing it from achieving long-term impact. Financial inclusion programs also suffer from similar implementation failures. Political interference often results in poor targeting, resource misallocation, and loan repayment issues due to political incitement. There is an urgent need to strengthen program design, management, and accountability to ensure impactful outcomes. Simultaneously, we must enhance the private sector’s role by providing supportive policies and incentives for job creation.
IEA – What have you discovered about what works to improve women’s economic opportunities in Kenya, and can you share a specific example where your recent work helped shape a program or policy?
Joy – From my experience, addressing the women’s economic empowerment (WEE) challenge requires a synergistic mix of interventions, rather than a single solution. Supporting women’s entrepreneurship, for example, can increase their economic power. However, achieving viable enterprises that create jobs and improve economic well-being necessitates more than just awareness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Interventions such as access to affordable and appropriate credit, digital inclusion to enhance enterprise efficiency, and data-driven enterprise development programs are also essential. Data provides valuable insights into the outcomes of interventions and how they can be improved. Additionally, addressing challenges like childcare and other unpaid domestic work that hinder women’s economic participation is crucial. In Asia, the Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa, social gender norms further compound the challenge of addressing unpaid care and domestic work, highlighting a simultaneous need for interventions that can shift or circumvent social gender norms to achieve the desired impact. In essence, the WEE challenge is a complex journey, especially within changing social dynamics. This necessitates the constant use of data in program design and implementation, and a collaborative approach to interventions.
Our work has demonstrated impact in several areas. For instance, our research and policy engagements in financial inclusion have led to better regulations for financial programs, improving consumer protection and increasing access. Our work in gender data production and use has revealed the need for policies addressing various WEE challenges. For example, Kenya’s first nationally representative time-use data showed that women spend five times more time on unpaid care and domestic work than men, leading to time poverty and missed socioeconomic opportunities. This research influenced policymakers, resulting in the drafting of a national care policy currently undergoing the legislative process, and a budget allocation for its implementation. While the budget is not adequate, it is a positive start and should encourage support from other stakeholders.
Currently, I am supporting the testing of different childcare models for quality and affordable childcare services, particularly for low-income women. A previous intervention we established in collaboration with the University of Nairobi, while lacking direct financial support from the county government, demonstrated positive impacts that encouraged other counties to embrace childcare services as a pathway for WEE. A subsequent intervention received direct financial contributions from the County Government of Machakos, including wages for caretakers, security, and infrastructure. As we continue to showcase our work in quality and affordable childcare provision, there is growing enthusiasm from county governments. As we keep the momentum, we anticipate increased investment by various stakeholders, making quality childcare services more affordable and accessible.
IEA – How has diversity – or the lack of it – in economics affected the questions we ask and the methods we use? What concrete changes would make economic research more inclusive?
Joy – The lack of diversity in economics, particularly the underrepresentation of women, is a significant loss to the field and to society. A diverse range of perspectives fosters more comprehensive analysis, better policy recommendations, and a deeper understanding of economic issues. The varied experiences of both men and women enrich economic discourse, enabling more nuanced and effective solutions to socioeconomic challenges.
The male dominance of economics in both public and private sectors often leads to gender-blind macro policies that overlook the realities of implementation contexts. This oversight has profound implications, hindering progress in areas such as household nutrition, education, and human capital development, which are demonstrably improved by women’s income.
Sustainable and equitable development cannot be achieved when women are excluded or marginalized in socioeconomic platforms. We must actively support and encourage more women economists and researchers to ensure that economic discourse and policy outcomes are truly inclusive and representative. Some of the constraints facing women researchers include funding for higher education and research, research mentorship, social and gender norms that limit women’s mobility, and personal branding for progress.